Eurocentrism

Eurocentrism (also "Western-centrism") is a political term coined in the 1980s, referring to the notion of European exceptionalism, a worldview centered on Western civilization, as it had developed during the height of the European colonial empires since the early modern period.

The term Eurocentrism itself dates back to the late 1970s and became prevalent during the 1990s, especially in the context of decolonization and development aid and humanitarian aid offered by industrialised countries ("First World") to developing countries ("Third World").

Terminology

The adjective Eurocentric, or Europe-centric, has been in use, in various contexts, since at least the 1920s. The term is popularised (in French as européocentrique) in the context of decolonization and internationalism in the mid 20th century. English usage of Eurocentric as an ideological term in identity politics is current by the mid-1980s.

The abstract noun Eurocentrism (French eurocentrisme, earlier europocentrisme) as the term for an ideology was coined in the 1970s by the Egyptian Marxian economist Samir Amin, then director of the "African Institute for Economic Development and Planning" of the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. Amin used the term in the context of a global, core-periphery or dependency model of capitalist development. English usage of Eurocentrism is recorded by 1979.

The coinage of "Western-centrism" is younger, attested in the late 1990s, and specific to English.

European exceptionalism

During European colonial era, encyclopedias under "Europe", often sought to give a rationale for the predominance of European rule during the colonial period by referring to a special position taken by Europe compared to the other continents.

Thus, Johann Heinrich Zedler, in 1741, wrote that "even though Europe is the smallest of the world's four continents, it has for various reasons a position that places it before all others.... Its inhabitants have excellent customs, they are courteous and erudite in both sciences and crafts".^{[source needs translation]}

The Brockhaus Enzyklopädie (Conversations-Lexicon) of 1847 still has an ostensibly Eurocentric approach and claims about Europe that "its geographical situation and its cultural and political significance is clearly the most important of the five continents, over which it has gained a most influential government both in material and even more so in cultural aspects".^{[source needs translation]}

European exceptionalism thus grew out of the "Great Divergence" of the Early Modern period, due to the combined effects of the Scientific Revolution, the Commercial Revolution, and the rise of colonial empires, the Industrial Revolution and a Second European colonization wave.

European exceptionalism is widely reflected in popular genres of literature, especially literature for young adults (for example, Rudyard Kipling's Kim) and adventure literature in general. Portrayal of European colonialism in such literature has been analysed in terms of "Eurocentrism" in retrospect, such as presenting idealised and often exaggeratedly masculine Western heroes, who conquered 'savage' peoples in the remaining 'dark spaces' of the globe.

"European miracle", a term coined by Eric Jones in 1981, refers to this surprising rise of Europe during the Early Modern period. During the 15th to 18th centuries, a "great divergence" took place, comprising the European Renaissance, age of discovery, the formation of the colonial empires, the Age of Reason, and the associated leap forward in technology and the development of capitalism and early industrialisation. The result was that by the 19th century, European powers dominated world trade and world politics.

History of the concept

Anticolonialism

Even in the 19th century, anticolonial movements had developed claims about national traditions and values that were set against those of Europe. In some cases, as China, where local ideology was even more exclusionist than the Eurocentric one, Westernisation did not overwhelm longstanding Chinese attitudes to its own cultural centrality, but some would state that idea itself is a rather desperate attempt to cast Europe in a good light by comparison.

Orientalism develops in the 19th century as a disproportionate Western interest in and idealization of "Eastern" (i.e. Asian) cultures.

By the early 20th century, some historians, such as Arnold J. Toynbee, were attempting to construct multifocal models of world civilizations. Toynbee also drew attention in Europe to non-European historians, such as the medieval Tunisian scholar Ibn Khaldun. He also established links with Asian thinkers, such as through his dialogues with Daisaku Ikeda of Soka Gakkai International.

The explicit concept of "Eurocentrism" is a product of the period of decolonisation in the 1960s to 1970s. Its original context is the core-periphery or dependency model of capitalist development of Marxian economics (Amin 1974, 1988).

Debate since 1990s

Eurocentrism has been a particularly important concept in development studies. Brohman (1995) argued that Eurocentrism "perpetuated intellectual dependence on a restricted group of prestigious Western academic institutions that determine the subject matter and methods of research".

In treatises on historical or contemporary Eurocentrism that appeared since the 1990s, Eurocentrism is mostly cast in terms of dualisms such as civilized/barbaric or advanced/backward, developed/undeveloped, core/periphery, implying "evolutionary schemas through which societies inevitably progress", with a remnant of an "underlying presumption of a superior white Western self as referent of analysis" (640). Eurocentrism and the dualistic properties that it labels on non-European countries, cultures and persons have often been criticized in the political discourse of the 1990s and 2000s, particularly in the greater context of political correctness, race in the United States and affirmative action. In the 1990s, there was a trend of "criticizing" various geographic terms current in the English language as "Eurocentric", such as the traditional division of Eurasia into Europe and Asia or the term "Middle East". Eric Sheppard, in 2005, argued that contemporary Marxism itself has "Eurocentric traits" (in spite of "Eurocentrims" originating in the vocabulary of Marxian economics), because it supposes that the third world must go through a stage of capitalism before "progressive social formations can be envisioned".

There has been some debate on whether historical Eurocentrism qualifies as "just another ethnocentrism", as it is found in most of the world's cultures, especially in cultures with imperial aspirations, as in the Sinocentrism in China; in the Empire of Japan (c. 1868-1945), or during the American Century. James M. Blaut (2000) argued that Eurocentrism indeed army beyond other ethnocentrisms, as the scale of European colonial expansion was historically unprecedented and resulted in the formation of a "colonizer's model of the world".

Race and politics in the United States

The terms "Afrocentrism" vs. "Eurocentrism" have come to play a role in the 2000s to 2010s in the context of the political discourse on race in the United States and "Critical Whiteness Studies", aiming to expose "white supremacism" and supposed "white privilege".

Afrocentrist scholars, such as Molefi Asante, have argued that there is a prevalence of Eurocentric thought in the processing of much of academia on African affairs. On the other hand, in an article, 'Eurocentrism and Academic Imperialism' by Professor Seyed Mohammad Marandi, from the University of Tehran, states that Eurocentric thought exists in almost all aspects of academia in many parts of the world, especially in the humanities. Edgar Alfred Bowring states that in the West, self-regard, self-congratulation and denigration of the ‘Other’ run more deeply and those tendencies have infected more aspects of their thinking, laws and policy than anywhere else. Luke Clossey and Nicholas Guyatt have measured the degree of Eurocentrism in the research programs of top history departments. In Southern Europe and Latin America, a number of academic proposals to offer alternatives to the Eurocentric perspective have emerged, such as the project of the Epistemologies of the South by Portuguese scholar Boaventura de Sousa Santos and those of the Subaltern Studies groups in India and Latin America (the Modernity/Coloniality Group of Anibal Quijano, Edgardo Lander, Enrique Dussel, Santiago Castro-Gómez, Ramón Grosfoguel, and others.

See also

• Americentrism
• Environmental racism in Europe
• History of Western civilization
• Orientalism
• Pan-European identity
• Universalism in geography
• Western culture
• The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation
• The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics

Bibliography

• Bairoch, Paul (1993). Economics and World History: Myths and Paradoxes. University Of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-03462-3.
• Baudet, E. H. P. (1959). Paradise on Earth: Some Thoughts on European Images of Non-European Man. Translated by Elizabeth Wentholt. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. ASIN B0007DKQMW ^[archive]. (1965).
• Lefkowitz, Mary (1996). Not Out of Africa: How Afrocentrism Became an Excuse to Teach Myth as History. New York: Basic Books. ISBN 0-465-09837-1.
• Malhotra, Rajiv (2013). Being Different: An indian challenge to western universalism. Noida: Harpercollins India.
• Preiswerk, Roy; Dominique Perrot (1978). Ethnocentrism and History: Africa, Asia, and Indian America in Western Textbooks. New York and London: NOK. ISBN 0-88357-071-8.
• Rüsen, Jörn (2004). "How to Overcome Ethnocentrism: Approaches to a Culture of Recognition by History in the Twenty-First Century". History and Theory: Studies in the Philosophy of History (43:2004): 118–129.
• Trevor-Roper, Hugh (1965). The Rise of Christian Europe. London: Thames and Hudson. ASIN B000O894GO ^[archive].
• Samir Amin, Accumulation on a World Scale, Monthly Review Press, 1974.
• Samir Amin: L’eurocentrisme, critique d’une idéologie. Paris 1988, engl. Eurocentrism, Monthly Review Press 1989, ISBN 0-85345-786-7
• J.M. Blaut: The Colonizer's Model of the World: Geographical Diffusionism and Eurocentric History. Guilford Press 1993. ISBN 0-89862-348-0
• J.M. Blaut: Eight Eurocentric Historians. Guilford Press 2000. ISBN 1-57230-591-6
• Karl Haushofer, Geopolitik des pazifischen Ozeans, Berlin, Kurt Vowinckel Verlag, 1924.
• Vassilis Lambropoulos, The rise of Eurocentrism: Anatomy of interpretation, Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1993
• Ella Shohat; Robert Stam, Unthinking Eurocentrism: multiculturalism and the media, Routledge 1994, ISBN 0-415-06325-6
• Jose Rabasa, Inventing America: Spanish Historiography and the Formation of Eurocentrism (Oklahoma Project for Discourse and Theory, Vol 2), University of Oklahoma Press 1994
• Ella Shohat and Robert Stam, Unthinking Eurocentrism: multiculturalism and the media, Routledge 1994
• Ilia Xypolia, Eurocentrism and Orientalism, The Encyclopedia of Postcolonial Studies, 2016.

“The Colonizer’s Model of the World: Geographical Diffusionism and Eurocentric History,” by J.M. Blaut The Guilford Press, New York, NY. 1993.

“The Invention of the Americas: Eclipse of “the Other” and the Myth of Modernit,” by Enrique Dussel. Translated by Michael D. Barber. The Continuum Publishing Company, New York, NY. 1995.

“The Language of Paradise,” by Maurice Olender. Harvard University Press.

“Oriental Enlightenment,” by J.J. Clarke. Routledge, London and New York, 1997.

“Provincializing Europe,” by Dipesh Chakrabarty.

“Late Victorian Holocausts,” by Mike Davis. Verso. 2001.

“Unthinking Eurocentrism: Multiculturalism and the Media,” by Ella Shohat and Robert Stam. Routledge. 1994.

“Eight Eurocentric Historians,” by J. M. Blaut. The Guilford Press. 2000.

“White Mythologies: Writing History and the West,” by Robert Young. Routledge, London, England. 1990.

“Imagining India,” by Ronald Inden. Indiana University Press. 2000.

“Liberalism and Empire: A Study in Nineteenth-Century British Liberal Thought,” by Uday Singh Mehta. The University of Chicago Press. 1999.

“The Shape of Ancient Thought: Comparative Studies in Greek and Indian Philosophies,” by Thomas McEvilley. Allworth Press. New York. 2002.

“Masks of Conquest,” by Gauri Viswanathan. Oxford University Press. New Delhi. 1998.

“Dowry Deaths,” by Veena Talwar Oldenburg. Oxford University Press. 2002.

“Dislocating Cultures: Identities, Traditions, and Third World Feminism,” by Uma Narayan.. Routledge Publishing. 1997.

“Southernization,” by Lynda Shaffer. Journal of World History 5 (1994):1-21.

“Colonial Indology,” by Dilip Chakrabarti. Munshiram Manoharlal. 1997.

“Castes of Mind,” by Nicholas Dirks. Princeton University Press. 2001.

“Culture and Imperialism,” by Edward W. Said. Vintage Books – A Division of Random House, Inc., New York, NY. 1993.

“Representing the Colonized: Anthropology’s Interlocutors,” by Edward W. Said. Critical Inquiry, Volume15 Winter 1989.

“Orientalism,” by Edward Said. Vintage Books, a division of Random House, New York, 1979.

“Lies My Teacher Told Me,” by James W. Loewen. New Press. 1995.

“Culture & Power,” by David Swartz. University of Chicago Press. 1997.

“Orientalism and Religion,” by Richard King. Routledge. 1999.

“Before European Hegemony – The World System A.D. 1250-1350,” by Janet L. Abu-Lughod. Oxford University Press, New York.

“The Myth of Christian Uniqueness: Towards a Pluralistic Theology of Religions,” Edited by John Hick and Paul K. Knitter. Orbis Books, Maryknoll, New York.

“Breaking With The Enlightenment,” by Rajani Kannepalli Kanth. Humanities Press, New Jersey 1997.

“Beyond Vanishing Woods,” by Deep Narayan Pande. India. 1996.

“Disciples of Destruction,” by Charles W. Sutherland. Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York, 1987.

“Machines as the Measure of Men,” by Michael Adas. Cornell University Press. 1989.

“Gender, Slavery and Law in Colonial India,” by Indrani Chatterjee. Copyright Oxford University Press. 1999.

“Impressing the Whites: The New International Slavery,” by Richard Crasta. Invisible Man Books. India.

“Poverty From the Wealth of Nations: Integration and Polarization in the Global Economy since 1760,” by M. Shahid Alam Palgrave Publishers Ltd., Hampshire, Great Britain, 2000.

“Skin Trade,” by Ann duCille. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1996.

“The Dark Side of Christian History,” by Helen Ellerbe. Morningstar and Lark. Orlando. 1995.

“Mis-Education of the Negro,” by Carter G. Woodson. Africa World Press. Trenton. 1998.

“Blacks in Antiquity,” by Frank M. Snowden. Harvard University Press. 1970.

“Racial Economy of Science,” edited by Sandra Harding. Indiana University Press. 1993.

“Pedagogy of the Oppressed,” by Paulo Freire. Continuum. New York. 2001.

“Towards a Global Science,” by Susantha Goonatilake. Indiana University Press. 1998.

“Wretched of the Earth,” by Frantz Fanon. Grove Press. 1963.

“Is Science Multicultural?” by Sandra Harding. Indiana University Press. 1998.

“Asia in the Making of Europe. Volume III,” by Donald Lach and Edwin Van Kley. University of Chicago Press. 1993.

“ReOrient: Global Economy in the Asian Age,” by Andre Gunder Frank. University of California Press. 1998.

“Culture, Ideology, Hegemony,” by K. N. Pannikar. Anthem Press. London. 1995.

• James Morris Blaut (The Colonizer’s Model of the World, Guilford Press, 1993),
• John M. Hobson (The Eastern Origins of Western Civilization, Cambridge UP, 2004),
• Jack Goody (The Theft of History, Cambridge UP, 2012).

links

• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Eurocentrism&diff=prev&oldid=610060979 ^[archive]
• Amazon.com: The Challenge of Eurocentrism: Global Perspectives, Policy, and Prospects (9780230612273): Rajani Kannepalli Kanth: Books ^[archive]**The Challenge of Eurocentrism: Global Perspectives, Policy, and Prospects [Rajani Kannepalli Kanth] on Amazon.com. *FREE* super saver shipping on qualifying offers.

  Eurocentrism is the current object of a global critique, which has the potential to be as significant as Marxist and Feminist critiques have been. This critique focuses on and dissects the paradigms that have emanated from the European Enlightenment. This set of papers represents the very first set of theoretical appraisals of the project by some of the world's leading researchers in the area.