The Ashvamedha (Sanskrit: अश्वमेध aśvamedhá) is a horse sacrifice ritual followed by the Śrauta tradition of Vedic religion. It was used by ancient Indian kings to prove their imperial sovereignty: a horse accompanied by the king's warriors would be released to wander for a period of one year. In the territory traversed by the horse, any rival could dispute the king's authority by challenging the warriors accompanying it. After one year, if no enemy had managed to kill or capture the horse, the animal would be guided back to the king's capital. It would be then sacrificed, and the king would be declared as an undisputed sovereign.
A stallion is selected and released for a year of wandering in the company of a hundred or more warriors. The king remains at home and turns over rulership to the adhvaryu priest who makes daily ghee libations into a footprint of the absent horse. The hotr priest recites evening narrations of the exploits of past kings. The release of the horse is considered an invitation to dispute the authority of the king. If the horse wanders into a territory controlled by someone who doesn't recognize the authority of the king, the rivals challenge the invading warriors accompanying the horse. After almost a year the horse is guided home, if no defending army has managed to kill or capture it.
Soma pressings and various animal sacrifices are performed during the building of a great altar. The four major priests symbolically receive the four quarters of space and the four royal queens. On the second of three pressing days, the horse, a hornless goat and gayal are dedicated to Prajapati. Other animals are dedicated to a variety of deities. Three of the queens wash the horse and adorn it with jewelry and ghee. The horse, hornless goat, and gayal are asphyxiated. The chief queen lies down and the adhvaryu guides the horse's penis against the queen's vagina, signifying the birth of a new king. The animals are dismembered. The king ascends the throne while the Purusha Sukta is recited.
The adhvaryu takes the dismembered parts of the three chief animals and assembles them on the ground with the head of the goat facing west, the other two animals facing east. All the parts are then offered into the ahavaniya. The adhvaryu makes three additional offerings into the gayal’s throat, on the right front hoof of the horse, and into an iron bowl. A final offering is made using a leper who stands in water as an altar.
Everything connected with the horse sacrifice is found only in the Late Books: hymns I.162-163 describe the horse sacrifice, X.157.1-3 were the verses recited at the sacrifice, and the word Aśvamedha (though only as a personal name) is found only in VIII.68.15- 16. e. Dadhyanc is named almost exclusively in the very Late Books: in I.80.16; 84.13; 116.12; 117.22; 119.9; 139.9; IX.108.4; X.48.2; and in one hymn in an Early Book classified by Oldenberg as a late or late redacted hymn, notorious for its late words: VI.16.14. And the myth of his head being replaced by that of a horse is known only to the late references in Book I. (Talageri 2008)
List of performers
Sanskrit epics and Puranas mention numerous legendary performances of the horse sacrifice. For example, according to the Mahabharata, Emperor Bharata performed a hundred Ashvamedha ceremonies on the banks of Yamuna, three hundred on the banks of Saraswati and four hundred on the banks of the Ganga. He again performed a thousand Ashvamedha on different locations and a hundred Rajasuya.
The historical performers of Ashvamedha include:
|Pushyamitra Shunga||185-149 BCE||Shunga|||
|Satakarni I||1st or 2nd century CE||Satavahana|||
|Vasishthiputra Sri Santamula or Chantamula||3rd century CE||Andhra Ikshvaku|||
|Bhavanaga||305-320 CE||Nagas of Padmavati|||
|Shivakanda Varman||4th century CE||Early Pallava|||
|Kumaragupta I||414 – 455 CE||Gupta|||
|Madhava Varmana||440-460 CE||Vishnukundina|||
|Pravarasena II||5th century CE||Vakataka|||
|Dharasena||5th century CE||Traikutaka|||
|Krishnavarman||5th century CE||Kadamba|||
|Pulakeshin I||543–566||Chalukyas of Vatapi|||
|Pulakeshin II||610–642 CE||Chalukyas of Vatapi|||
|Rajadhiraja Chola||1044–1052 CE||Chola|||
|Jai Singh II||1699–1743 CE||Kachwahas of Jaipur|||
The earliest recorded criticism of the ritual comes from the Cārvāka, an atheistic school of Indian philosophy that assumed various forms of philosophical skepticism and religious indifference. A quotation of the Cārvāka from Madhavacharya's Sarva-Darsana-Sangraha states: "The three authors of the Vedas were buffoons, knaves, and demons. All the well-known formulae of the pandits, jarphari, turphari, etc. and all the obscene rites for the queen commanded in Aswamedha, these were invented by buffoons, and so all the various kinds of presents to the priests, while the eating of flesh was similarly commanded by night-prowling demons."
Griffith (1899) omits verses VSM 23.20–31 (the ritual obscenities), protesting that they are "not reproducible even in the semi-obscurity of a learned European language" (alluding to other instances where he renders explicit scenes in Latin rather than English). A. B. Keith's 1914 translation also omits verses.
This part of the ritual offended the Dalit reformer and framer of the Indian constitution B. R. Ambedkar and is frequently mentioned in his writings as an example of the perceived degradation of Brahmanical culture.
While others such has Manohar L. Varadpande, praised the ritual as "social occasions of great magnitude". Rick F. Talbott writes that "Mircea Eliade treated the Ashvamedha as a rite having a cosmogonic structure which both regenerated the entire cosmos and reestablished every social order during its performance."
In Hindu revivalism
In the Arya Samaj reform movement of Dayananda Sarasvati, the Ashvamedha is considered an allegory or a ritual to get connected to the "inner Sun" (Prana) According to Dayananda, no horse was actually to be slaughtered in the ritual as per the Yajurveda. Following Dayananda, the Arya Samaj disputes the very existence of the pre-Vedantic ritual; thus Swami Satya Prakash Saraswati claims that
the word in the sense of the Horse Sacrifice does not occur in the Samhitas [...] In the terms of cosmic analogy, ashva s the Sun. In respect to the adhyatma paksha, the Prajapati-Agni, or the Purusha, the Creator, is the Ashva; He is the same as the Varuna, the Most Supreme. The word medha stands for homage; it later on became synonymous with oblations in rituology, since oblations are offered, dedicated to the one whom we pay homage. The word deteriorated further when it came to mean 'slaughter' or 'sacrifice'.
He argues that the animals listed as sacrificial victims are just as symbolic as the list of human victims listed in the Purushamedha. (which is generally accepted as a purely symbolic sacrifice already in Rigvedic times).
All World Gayatri Pariwar since 1991 has organized performances of a "modern version" of the Ashvamedha where a statue is used in place of a real horse, according to Hinduism Today with a million participants in Chitrakoot, Madhya Pradesh on April 16 to 20, 1994. Such modern performances are sattvika Yajnas where the animal is worshipped without killing it, the religious motivation being prayer for overcoming enemies, the facilitation of child welfare and development, and clearance of debt, entirely within the allegorical interpretation of the ritual, and with no actual sacrifice of any animal.
- Knipe 2015, p. 234-5.
- Drekmeier 1962, p. 46.
- Knipe 2015, p. 235.
- Jamison 1996, p. 68.
- Knipe 2015, p. 236.
- Knipe 2015, p. 227, 236.
- Knipe 2015, p. 234.
- Ganguly 1883.
- Chandra Mauli Mani (2005). A Journey Through India's Past. Northern Book Centre. p. 37. ISBN 978-81-7211-194-6.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Knipe 2015, p. 8.
- Bandyopadhyaya 2007, p. 203.
- Singh 2008, p. 510.
- Knipe 2015, p. 9.
- Chaurasia 2002, p. 228.
- Agrawal 1989, p. 139.
- Sircar 1990, p. 101.
- Knipe 2015, p. 10.
- Karl J. Schmidt (20 May 2015). An Atlas and Survey of South Asian History. Taylor & Francis. p. 77. ISBN 978-1-317-47680-1.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Rama Shankar Tripathi (1942). History of Ancient India. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 466. ISBN 978-81-208-0018-2.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Yamini Narayanan (2014). Religion, Heritage and the Sustainable City: Hinduism and Urbanisation in Jaipur. Routledge. p. 106. ISBN 978-1-135-01269-4.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Madhavacarya, Sarvadarsana-sangraha, English translation by E. B. Cowell and A. E. Gough, 1904 quoted in Debiprasad Chattopadhyaya (ed.), Carvaka/Lokayata: An Anthology of Source Materials and Some Recent Studies (New Delhi: Indian Council of Philosophical Research, 1990)
- Keith, Arthur Berridale (trans) (1914). The Veda of the Black Yajus School Entitled Taittiriya Sanhita, Oxford, pp. 615-16
- Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, Writings and Speeches. p. 1376.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- "History of Indian Theatre, Volume 1" by Manohar Laxman Varadpande, p.46
- "Sacred Sacrifice: Ritual Paradigms in Vedic Religion and Early Christianity" by Rick F. Talbott, p. 133
- as a bahuvrihi, saptāśva "having seven horses" is another name of the Sun, referring to the horses of his chariot.; akhandjyoti.org Archived September 29, 2007, at the Wayback Machine. glosses 'ashva' as "the symbol of mobility, valour and strength" and 'medha' as "the symbol of supreme wisdom and intelligence", yielding a meaning of 'ashvamedha' of "the combination of the valour and strength and illumined power of intellect"
- The Critical and Cultural Study of the Shatapatha Brahmana by Swami Satya Prakash Saraswati, p. 415; 476
- Hinduism Today, June 1994 Archived December 13, 2006, at the Wayback Machine.
- "Ashwamedha Yagam in city". Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh. The Hindu. Oct 13, 2005. Retrieved 30 September 2014.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Ashwamedhayagnam.org Archived September 29, 2007, at the Wayback Machine.
- Agrawal, Ashvini (1989). Rise and Fall of the Imperial Guptas. Motilal Banarsidass. ISBN 978-81-208-0592-7.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Bandyopadhyaya, Jayantanuja (2007). Class and Religion in Ancient India. Anthem. ISBN 978-1-84331-332-8.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Chaurasia, Radhey Shyam (2002). History of Ancient India. Atlantic. ISBN 978-81-269-0027-5.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Drekmeier, Charles (1962). Kingship and Community in Early India. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-0114-3.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Jamison, Stephanie (1996), Sacrificed Wife / Sacrificer's Wife, Oxford: Oxford University Press<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Knipe, David M. (2015), Vedic Voices: Intimate Narratives of a Living Andhra Tradition, Oxford: Oxford University Press<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Singh, Upinder (2008). A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India. Pearson Education India. ISBN 9788131711200.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Sircar, D C (1990), "Political History", in Barpujari, H K (ed.), The Comprehensive History of Assam, I, Guwahati: Assam Publication Board, pp. 94–171<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- Mackenzie, Donald A, Indian Myth and Legend, Sacred Texts<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
- K.M, Ganguly (1896), The Mahabharata of Krishna Dwaipayana Vyasa, Sacred Texts<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>