Anti-Hindu bias in the BBC

From Dharmapedia Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • On 2 Sep 2013, BBC’s Inside Out programme focussed on the forgotten Sikh schoolgirl victims of the grooming gangs. Whilst the BBC should be commended for finally making this programme, they made no mention of the history of the predations of Muslim grooming gangs on Sikh girls between 1988 and recent years. Furthermore, considering that these grooming gangs have been in operation in Britain for so long, it is only since 2011 that there has been any admission by the media that the gangs truly existed. And it is only since the Home Affairs Select Committee reported in July 2013 that we can say that the government has acknowledged that the Muslim grooming gangs existed. Even then, we saw that some left-wing members of the committee attempted to get the committee to deny there was any association at all between Asians (i.e. Muslims) and these grooming offenders. Significantly, when the BBC news website reported on the programme, not once did the BBC website report mention that the claims made by the Sikhs in the programme were that the perpetrators are overwhelmingly Muslim. The BBC news report implies that it was Sikh men who were grooming Sikh girls! So, as one part of the BBC is giving coverage to Sikh activity to stop gangs of Muslims grooming Sikh schoolgirls, another arm of the BBC is trying to conceal what the programme was actually about.
    • Easy Meat, Inside Britain’s Grooming Gang Scandal by Peter McLoughlin.
  • Another interesting example where Witzel and his cohorts on the IER list are defending the AIT is the attack on a BBC website 47 by some signatories of Witzel Petition. It is being alleged on the Indology and IER yahoogroups that the content of the website is motivated by Hindutva interpretations of ancient Indian history! The website lists clear reasons as to why the Aryan invasion theory is rejected, and how it demeans Indian heritage and intelligence. One wonders why these Indologists are planning to attack the BBC now if they do not uphold the AIT? Are these people still using AIT as a bargaining point, in the hope that their opponents will at least concede the equally baseless Aryan migration theory as a compromise? What exactly is so offensive on this webpage? The webpage does not even replace AIT with the opposite indigenous Aryan theory. So why are these Indologists so peeved?

Links[edit]

https://www.reddit.com/r/IndianNewsBias/comments/o3dnmv/bbc_news_cuts_of_all_of_jammu_kashmir_ladakh_from/ [archive] https://www.jihadwatch.org/2021/07/the-bbcs-notoriously-anti-israel-and-pro-palestinian-middle-east-coverage [archive] https://www.reddit.com/r/IndianNewsBias/comments/p4ylrg/bbc/ [archive] The BBC whitewashed Pakistani terrorism whilst lying about democratic India | François Gautier [archive] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9954701/BBC-admits-impartiality-breach-News-Ten-report-Churchill.html [archive] https://www.opindia.com/2021/09/bbc-pakistan-afghanistan-propaganda-christine-fair/ [archive] https://web.archive.org/web/20210907164451if_/https://www.reddit.com/r/IndianNewsBias/comments/pjqsyy/bbc_showing_its_true_coloursi_wonder_if_its_a/ [archive] https://www.opindia.com/2021/09/bbc-went-from-fake-news-shielding-terrorist-ministers-of-taliban/ [archive] https://www.opindia.com/2021/09/bbc-follows-propaganda-the-wire-job-application-based-on-caste-and-religion/ [archive]

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2022/06/reuters-bbc-denounce-indian-official-for-offending-islam-refuse-to-report-what-she-said [archive] https://www.jihadwatch.org/2022/09/uk-bbc-and-sky-news-cover-muslim-violence-against-hindus-without-mentioning-either-group [archive]

https://www.opindia.com/2022/09/bbc-latest-report-leicester-accept-hindus-did-not-start-violence-still-shield-islamists/ [archive]

https://hindupost.in/world/western-media-peddles-propaganda-against-ayodhya-ram-mandir-ahead-of-inauguration/ [archive]