Andronovo culture

From Dharmapedia Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Andronovo culture
File:Andronovo culture.png
Geographical range Eurasian steppe
Period Bronze Age
Dates c. 2000 BC – 900 BC
Preceded by Corded Ware culture[1]
File:Indo-Iranian origins.png
Archaeological cultures associated with Indo-Iranian migrations (after EIEC). The Andronovo, BMAC and Yaz cultures have often been associated with Indo-Iranian migrations. The GGC (Swat), Cemetery H, Copper Hoard and PGW cultures are candidates for cultures associated with Indo-Aryan migrations.

The Andronovo culture is a collection of similar local Bronze Age cultures that flourished ca. 2000–900 BCE in western Siberia and the west Asiatic steppe.[2] It is probably better termed an archaeological complex or archaeological horizon.

The older Sintashta culture (2100–1800), formerly included within the Andronovo culture, is now considered separately, but regarded as its predecessor, and accepted as part of the wider Andronovo horizon.

Most researchers associate the Andronovo horizon with early Indo-Iranian languages, though it may have overlapped the early Uralic-speaking area at its northern fringe.[3]

According to genetic study conducted by Allentoft et al. (2015), the Andronovo culture and the preceding Sintashta culture are partially derived from the Corded Ware culture, given the higher proportion of ancestry matching the earlier farmers of Europe, similar to the admixture found in the genomes of the Corded Ware population.[4]


The name derives from the village of Andronovo, Krasnoyarsk Krai (Lua error: callParserFunction: function "#coordinates" was not found.), where the Russian archaeologist Arkadi Tugarinov discovered its first remains in 1914. Several graves were discovered, with skeletons in crouched positions, buried with richly decorated pottery. The Andronovo culture was first identified by the Russian archaeologist Sergei Teploukhov in the 1920s.[5]


At least four sub-cultures of the Andronovo horizon have been distinguished, during which the culture expands towards the south and the east:

Within the Andronovo horizon, one culture stands out as especially related to the Vedic culture of the Indo-Aryans: the Fedorovo culture. While she finds plenty of Iranian toponyms, many probably stemming from the later Scythian period (1st mill. BCE, as far west as Ukraine), yet “part of the Andronovo toponyms can only be interpreted as Indo-Aryan”. Moreover, ”the Indo-Iranian toponyms of the pre-Scythian period have been found on the territory populated by the Fedorovo tribes”. Let us assume, with the author, that the Fedorovo culture is Indo-Aryan; though mixed in its classical habitat on the eastern slopes of the Urals with Ugrian, the Uralic branch that was to spawn Hungarian. It flourished around 1700 BC, just in time to reach India for an invasion ca. 1500. That looks neat and surely AIT believers will seize upon it as supporting their invasion scenario. But then, Kuzmina herself provides material reasons for inverting this northwest-to-southeast scenario: “The hypothesis of an origin of the Fedorovo type in the Urals has been disputed. The sources for Fedorovo ceramic technology and triangular ornametation are found in the Eneolithic of central and eastern Kazakhstan.” (p.201) Worse, even eastern Kazakhstand and beyond: “Federovo monuments are discovered not only in the Urals but also in the south of Central Asia and Afghanistan, where Ugrians have never lived.” (p.201) Moreover, elsewhere she designates central Kazakhstan as the Fedorovo heartland: “The further one moves from central Kazakhstan, the frequency of the complex diminishes and substratum elements increase”. (p.24) It won’t take any special pleading to have the Fedorovans migrate from Bactria to the Urals instead. At best we could agree that at present, the distribution of Fedorovo findings across Central Asia can be interpreted in more ways than just the Urals-to-Bactria scenario. Moreover, any movement understood as going to Bactria, is never traced as going beyond it, entering India. Here too, we notice a disappointment for those who expected an underpinning for AIT-compliant migrations from the Andronovo data. Elst 2018 [2] [archive]

Geographic extent[edit]

The geographical extent of the culture is vast and difficult to delineate exactly. On its western fringes, it overlaps with the approximately contemporaneous, but distinct, Srubna culture in the Volga-Ural interfluvial. To the east, it reaches into the Minusinsk depression, with some sites as far west as the southern Ural Mountains,[7] overlapping with the area of the earlier Afanasevo culture.[8] Additional sites are scattered as far south as the Koppet Dag (Turkmenistan), the Pamir (Tajikistan) and the Tian Shan (Kyrgyzstan). The northern boundary vaguely corresponds to the beginning of the Taiga.[7] In the Volga basin, interaction with the Srubna culture was the most intense and prolonged, and Federovo style pottery is found as far west as Volgograd. Mallory notes that the Tazabagyab culture south of Andronovo could be an offshoot of the former (or Srubna), alternatively the result of an amalgamation of steppe cultures and the Central Asian oasis cultures (Bishkent culture and Vaksh culture).[2]

In the initial Sintastha-Petrovka phase, the Andronovo culture is limited to the northern and western steppes in the southern Urals-Kazakhstan.[2] Towards the middle of the 2nd millennium in the Alakul Phase (2100–1400 BC), the Fedorovo Phase (1400–1200) and the final Alekseyevka Phase (1400–1000), the Andronovo cultures begin to move intensively eastwards, expanding as far east as the Upper Yenisei in the Altai Mountains, succeeding the non-Indo-European Okunev culture.[2]

In southern Siberia and Kazakhstan, the Andronovo culture was succeeded by the Karasuk culture (1500–800 BCE). On its western border, it is succeeded by the Srubna culture, which partly derives from the Abashevo culture. The earliest historical peoples associated with the area are the Cimmerians and Saka/Scythians, appearing in Assyrian records after the decline of the Alekseyevka culture, migrating into Ukraine from ca. the 9th century BCE (see also Ukrainian stone stela), and across the Caucasus into Anatolia and Assyria in the late 8th century BCE, and possibly also west into Europe as the Thracians (see Thraco-Cimmerian), and the Sigynnae, located by Herodotus beyond the Danube, north of the Thracians, and by Strabo near the Caspian Sea. Both Herodotus and Strabo identify them as Iranian.


The Andronovo culture consisted of both communities that were largely mobile as well as those settled in small villages.[2] Settlements are especially pronounced in its Central Asian parts.[2] Fortifications include ditches, earthen banks as well as timber palisades, of which an estimated twenty have been discovered.[2] Andronovo villages typically contain around two to twenty houses, but settlements containing as much as a hundred houses have been discovered.[2] Andronovo houses were generally constructed from pine, cedar, or birch, and were usually aligned overlooking the banks of rivers.[2] Larger homes range in the size from 80 to 300 sqm, and probably belonged to extended families, a typical feature among early Indo-Iranians.[2]

Andronovo livestock included cattle, horses, sheep, goats and camels.[7] The domestic pig is notably absent, which is typical of a mobile economy. The percentage of cattle among Andronovo remains are significantly higher than among their western Srubna neighbours.[2] The horse was represented on Andronovo sites and was used for both riding and traction.[2] Agriculture also played an important role in the Andronovo economy.[9] The Andronovo culture is notable for regional advances in metallurgy.[7] They mined deposits of copper ore in the Altai Mountains from around the 14th century BC.[10] Bronze objects were numerous, and workshops existed for working copper.[10]

The Andronovo dead were buried in timber or stone chambers under both round and rectangular kurgans (tumuli).[2] Burials were accompanied by livestock, wheeled vehicles, cheek-pieces for horses, and weapons, ceramics and ornaments.[2] Among the most notable remains are the burials of chariots, dating from around 2,000 BC and possibly earlier.[2] The chariots are found with paired horse-teams, and the ritual burial of the horse in a "head and hooves" cult has also been found.[2]

At Kytmanovo in Russia between Mongolia and Kazakhstan, dated 1746–1626 BCE, a strain of Yersinia pestis was extracted from a dead woman's tooth in a grave common to her and to two children.[11] This strain's genes express flagellin, which triggers the human immune response. However, by contrast with other prehistoric Yersinia pestis bacteria, the strain does so weakly; later, historic plague does not express flagellin at all, accounting for its virulence. The Kytmanovo strain was therefore under selection toward becoming a plague[12] (although it was not the plague).[13] The three people in that grave all died at the same time, and the researcher believes that this para-plague is what killed them.[14]

Ethnolinguistic affiliation[edit]

A large group of scholars associate the Andronovo culture with the Indo-Iranians (Aryans); it is often credited[by whom?] with the invention of the spoke-wheeled chariot around 2000 BCE.[2][15][16] The association between the Andronovo culture and the Indo-Iranians is corroborated by the distribution of Iranian place-names across the Andronovo horizon and by the historical evidence of dominance by various Iranian peoples, including Saka (Scythians), Sarmatians and Alans, throughout the Andronovo horizon during the 1st millennium BC.[2]

The Sintashta on the upper Ural River, noted for its chariot burials and kurgans containing horse burials, is considered the type site of the Sintashta culture, and it is conjectured that the language spoken was still in the Proto-Indo-Iranian stage.[17]

Comparisons between the archaeological evidence of the Andronovo and textual evidence of Indo-Iranians (Vedas and Avesta) are frequently made to support the Indo-Iranian identity of the Andronovo.[2] The modern explanations for the Indo-Iranianization of Greater Iran and the Indian subcontinent rely heavily on the supposition that the Andronovo expanded southwards into Central Asia or at least achieved linguistic dominance across the Bronze Age urban centres of the region, such as the Bactria–Margiana Archaeological Complex.[2] While the earliest phases of the Andronovo culture are regarded as co-ordinate with the late period of Indo-Iranian linguistic unity, it is likely that in the later period they constituted a branch of the Iranians.[2]

The identification of Andronovo as Indo-Iranian has been challenged by scholars who point to the absence of the characteristic timber graves of the steppe south of the Oxus River.[18] Sarianidi (as cited in Bryant 2001:207) states that "direct archaeological data from Bactria and Margiana show without any shade of doubt that Andronovo tribes penetrated to a minimum extent into Bactria and Margianian oases".

Based on its use by Indo-Aryans in Mitanni and Vedic India, its prior absence in the Near East and Harappan India, and its 16th–17th century BCE attestation at the Andronovo site of Sintashta, Kuzmina (1994) argues that the chariot corroborates the identification of Andronovo as Indo-Iranian. Klejn (1974) and Brentjes (1981) find the Andronovo culture much too late for an Indo-Iranian identification since chariot-using Aryans appear in Mitanni by the 15th to 16th century BCE. However, Anthony & Vinogradov (1995) dated a chariot burial at Krivoye Lake to around 2000 BCE.[19]

Eugene Helimski has suggested that the Andronovo people spoke a separate branch of the Indo-Iranian group of languages. He claims that borrowings in the Finno-Ugric languages support this view.[20] Vladimir Napolskikh has proposed that borrowings in Finno-Ugric indicate that the language was specifically of the Indo-Aryan type.[21]

Since older forms of Indo-Iranian words have been taken over in Uralic and Proto-Yeniseian, occupation by some other languages (also lost ones) cannot be ruled out altogether, at least for part of the Andronovo area: i. e., Uralic and Yeniseian.[22]

Genetics and physical anthropology[edit]

The Andronovo have been described by archaeologists as exhibiting pronounced Caucasoid features.[16] A 2004 study also established that, during the Bronze/Iron Age period, the majority of the population of Kazakhstan (part of the Andronovo culture during Bronze Age), was of West Eurasian origin (with mtDNA haplogroups such as U, H, HV, T, I and W), and that prior to the thirteenth to seventh century BC, all Kazakh samples belonged to European lineages.[23] Other studies confirm, that during Bronze Age in areas to the north of present-day China, the boundary between Caucasoid and Mongoloid populations was on the eastern slopes of the Altai, in Western Mongolia.[24][25] Some Caucasoid influence extended also into Northeast Mongolia,[26] and the population of present-day Kazakhstan was Caucasoid during the Bronze/Iron Age period.[27] Archaeological investigations likewise suggest, that in the steppe region of Central Asia and the Altai Mountains, the first food production began towards the end of the 3rd millennium BC and that the peoples who first entered this region were Caucasoid of the Afanasevo culture who came from the Aral Sea area (Kelteminar culture).[28]

In 2009, a genetic study of ancient Siberian cultures, the Andronovo culture, the Karasuk culture, the Tagar culture and the Tashtyk culture, was published in Human Genetics.[16] Ten individuals of the Andronovo horizon in southern Siberia from 1400 BC to 1000 BC were surveyed.[16] Extractions of mtDNA from nine individuals were determined to represent two samples of haplogroup U4, one sample of Z1, one sample T1, one sample of U2e, one sample of T4, one sample of H, one sample of K2b and one sample of U5a1.[16] Extractions of Y-DNA from one individual was determined to belong to Y-DNA haplogroup C (but not C3), while the other two extractions were determined to belong to haplogroup R1a1a, which is thought to mark the eastward migration of the early Indo-Europeans.[16] Of the individuals surveyed only two (or 22%) were determined to be Mongoloid while seven (or 78%) were determined to be Caucasoid, with the majority being light-eyed and light-haired.[16]

In June 2015, another genetic study[29] surveyed one additional male and three female individuals of Andronovo culture. Extraction of Y-DNA from this individual was determined to belong to R1a1a1b2a2 (Z93- clade: Z2121).[30] Extractions of mtDNA were determined to represent two samples of U4 and two samples of U2e.

See also[edit]



<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. allentoft 2015.
  2. 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 2.12 2.13 2.14 2.15 2.16 2.17 2.18 2.19 2.20 Mallory 1997, pp. 20–21
  3. Beckwith 2009, p. 49: "Archaeologists are now generally agreed that the Andronovo culture of the Central Steppe region in the second millennium bc is to be equated with the Indo-Iranians."
  4. Allentoft, Morten; Sikora, Martin. "Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia". Nature. 522: 167–172. doi:10.1038/nature14507 [archive].<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  5. Great Soviet Encyclopaedia, Article "Andronovo".
  6. Diakonoff 1995:473
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Okladnikov, A. P. (1994), "Inner Asia at the dawn of history", The Cambridge history of early Inner Asia, Cambridge [u.a.]: Cambridge Univ. Press, p. 83, ISBN 0-521-24304-1<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  8. Mallory 1989:62
  9. "Stone Age: European cultures" [archive]. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved March 2, 2015.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  10. 10.0 10.1 "Central Asian Arts: Neolithic and Metal Age cultures" [archive]. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved March 2, 2015.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  11. Simon Rasmussen et al. (2015). "Early Divergent Strains of Yersinia pestis in Eurasia 5,000 Years Ago" [archive]. Cell. 163: 571–582. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.009 [archive]. PMC 4644222 [archive]. PMID 26496604 [archive].CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>, S14-15. This sample is marked "RISE505".
  12. Rasmussen, 575.
  13. Rasmussen, 578: the phylogenetic tree has RISE505 split off before the common ancestor of historic plague.
  14. Rasmussen, S15.
  15. Anthony & Vinogradov 1995
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 16.5 16.6 Keyser, Christine; Bouakaze, Caroline; Crubézy, Eric; Nikolaev, Valery G.; Montagnon, Daniel; Reis, Tatiana; Ludes, Bertrand (May 16, 2009). "Ancient DNA provides new insights into the history of south Siberian Kurgan people" [archive]. Human Genetics. Springer-Verlag. 126: 395–410. doi:10.1007/s00439-009-0683-0 [archive]. PMID 19449030 [archive]. Retrieved 15 February 2015.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  17. Mallory 1989 "The settlement and cemetery of Sintashta, for example, though located far to the north on the Trans-Ural steppe, provides the type of Indo-Iranian archaeological evidence that would more than delight an archaeologist seeking their remains in Iran or India."
  18. or south of the region between Kopet Dagh and Pamir-Karakorum. Francfort, in (Fussman et al. 2005, p. 268)
    Fussman, in (Fussman et al. 2005, p. 220)
    Francfort (1989), Fouilles de Shortugai
    Klejn (1974), Lyonnet (1993), Francfort (1989), Bosch-Gimpera (1973), Hiebert (1998), and Sarianidi (1993), as cited in Bryant (2001, ch. 10, pp. 206–207)
  19. Anthony & Vinogradov (1995)
    Kuzmina (1994), Klejn (1974), and Brentjes (1981), as cited in Bryant (2001:206)
  20. Helimski, Eugene. The southern neighbours of Finno-Ugrians: Iranians or an extinct branch of Aryans („Andronovo Aryans")? [archive] – In: Finnisch-ugrische Sprachen in Kontakt. Maastricht, 1997. S. 117–125.
  21. Напольских В. В. Уральско-арийские взаимоотношения: история исследований, новые решения и проблемы // Индоевропейская история в свете новых исследований. М.: МГОУ, 2010. С. 229—242. [archive]
  22. [1] [archive] M. Witzel – Linguistic Evidence for Cultural Exchange in Prehistoric Western Central Asia, 2003, Sino-Platonic Papers 129
  23. Fox, Lalueza; Sampietro, M. L.; Gilbert, M. T. P.; Facchini, F.; Pettener, D.; Bertranpetit, J. (May 7, 2004). "Unravelling migrations in the steppe: mitochondrial DNA sequences from ancient central Asians" [archive]. Proceedings of the Royal Society. Royal Society. 271: 941–7. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2698 [archive]. PMC 1691686 [archive]. PMID 15255049 [archive].<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  24. González-Ruiz, Mercedes; et al. (2012). "Tracing the Origin of the East-West Population Admixture in the Altai Region (Central Asia)" [archive]. PLOS ONE. 7: e48904. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048904 [archive]. PMC 3494716 [archive]. PMID 23152818 [archive].<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  25. Hollard, Clémence; et al. (2014). "Strong genetic admixture in the Altai at the Middle Bronze Age revealed by uniparental and ancestry informative markers". FSI:Genetics. 12: 199–207. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.05.012 [archive]. PMID 25016250 [archive].<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  26. Kim, Kijeong; et al. (2010). "A western Eurasian male is found in 2000-year-old elite Xiongnu cemetery in Northeast Mongolia". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 142: 429–40. doi:10.1002/ajpa.21242 [archive]. PMID 20091844 [archive].<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  27. Ismagulov, O; et al. (2010). "Physical Anthropology of Kazakh People and their Genesis" [archive]. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  28. Panyushkina, Irina P; et al. (2013). Liviu Giosan; Dorian Q. Fuller; Kathleen Nicoll; Rowan K. Flad; Peter D. Clift (eds.). "Climate-Induced Changes in Population Dynamics of Siberian Scythians (700–250 BC)" [archive]. ResearchGate: 145–154. doi:10.1029/2012GM001220 [archive].<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  29. Allentoft, Morten E.; Sikora, Martin; et al. (2015). "Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia". Nature. 522: 167–172. doi:10.1038/nature14507 [archive].<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  30. sample RISE512 (Allensoft et al 2015)


External links[edit]